Skip to main content
Background Animation

Telemedicine as part of Hospital@Home

Knowledge database Organisation Structures & processes Technology Data management & digitalisation Integration & interoperability Human Patient-centred approach B.3: Hospital @ Home - smooth transition of patients from hospital to home through the use of telemedicine and technology

The "Hospital at Home" (H@H) concept offers a way to meet the existing challenges in the healthcare sector. It enables patients to be cared for in their own homes, often supported by innovative telemedicine technologies. But how effective is this H@H concept really? This report shows which methods were combined in the SHIFT pilot study "Hospital@Home" to gain comprehensive and evidence-based insights into the role of telemedicine in the H@H model and presents initial recommendations for practice aimed at sustainably utilising the benefits of telemedicine in the context of H@H.

Problem description, research question and relevance

Healthcare is facing enormous challenges worldwide. An ageing population, the rising incidence of chronic diseases and the lack of resources make it necessary to find innovative solutions. Traditional inpatient treatments are often not only costly but also impractical for many patients, especially the elderly or those with mobility impairments. H@H is a concept that aims to care for patients in their own homes, which improves both the comfort and quality of life of patients. It can also help to avoid common complications, such as delirium, by providing a familiar home environment. A key component of this model is telemedicine, which makes it possible to offer medical services via digital means of communication. Telemedicine refers to medical treatments in which the interaction between medical staff and patients, as well as between several doctors, takes place without direct physical contact and communication takes place via information and communication technologies [1].

One example of successful telemedicine in the outpatient care sector is Medgate. Medgate has been offering telemedical services in Switzerland for over 20 years and has established itself as a leading provider in this field. With around 150 doctors, Medgate looks after an average of 1,500 patients with medical concerns every day and gives them quick and uncomplicated access to high-quality medical advice and treatment. This covers a wide range of medical issues - from acute health problems to questions about health behaviour [2]. In this way, costly hospital and doctor visits can be avoided [3] and patients with increased health risks can be identified in good time [2].

Communication poses a particular challenge here: As doctors cannot always see their patients (telephone, chat), they have to ask specifically about symptoms and correlations that are not visually accessible to them. The challenge here lies in focussing on the medical question on the one hand and understanding the patient's complexity on the other [4]. Targeted anamnesis and symptom-oriented questioning can be used to classify health problems, recognise urgency and make recommendations for further action. Patients can also provide Medgate doctors with additional information such as images, videos or voice messages to better assess their state of health [4]. In around 50% of cases, Medgate doctors can complete consultations entirely by telephone - provided that no additional examinations or laboratory values are required [4].

However, patients without prior experience of telemedicine may feel unsure - and may, for example, question whether they are receiving the same quality of care as they would in a physical consultation with a healthcare professional. Technical barriers such as access to the internet and digital devices also pose challenges. The question of where telemedicine actually offers an improvement in patient care is therefore of central importance. It is important to understand the potential benefits and challenges of telehealth in order to make informed decisions about its implementation within H@H.

It is also necessary to consider the perspectives of different stakeholders - including patients and healthcare professionals - to gain a comprehensive picture of the impact of telehealth on healthcare and ensure seamless implementation. Only a well-founded analysis can ensure that telemedicine is not just a temporary solution, but a sustainable component of future patient care.

Methods and procedures in the project

The SHIFT pilot study"Hospital@Home" follows a multi-method approach to analyse the implementation and impact of telemedicine in the context of H@H. The methods include:

  1. Quantitative patient surveys: These capture satisfaction, experiences and perceived quality of care through telemedicine. The surveys are conducted before and after implementation to measure changes.
  2. Clinical data analysis: This involves analysing patients' medical data to evaluate the results of H@H telemedicine support as a treatment approach. This includes hospitalisations, emergency visits and patients' general health development.
  3. Interviews with healthcareprofessionals: Data from healthcare providers such as hospital doctors, telemedicine specialists and GPs help to understand their perspectives and experiences of using telemedicine and provide insights into challenges and successes in implementation.
  4. Case studies: Selected patient cases will be analysed in detail to document specific outcomes and experiences and to identify the patient population best suited for H@H telemedicine support.

By combining these methods, the SHIFT study aims to provide comprehensive and evidence-based insights into the role of telemedicine in the H@H model.

Results and findings

Studies that have already been conducted have provided promising results that highlight the benefits of telemedicine in the context of H@H [5]. For example, a study by Eron et al. showed that patients treated via telemedicine achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes and recovered faster than comparable hospitalised patients. In addition, telemedicine care at home led to significant cost savings, as hospitalisations could be avoided or shortened [6]. Similarly, a study by Zychlinski et al. showed that the care of acutely ill patients within the framework of a telemedicine-supported H@H model has the potential to reduce the length of hospital stays without increasing the risk of readmissions. At the same time, the 30-day mortality rate could be reduced [7].

Building on these promising results, the "Hospital@Home" pilot study, which is being conducted as part of the Innosuisse flagship project SHIFT in Switzerland, is evaluating how telemedicine can be optimally integrated into existing healthcare systems. In a feasibility study, the above-mentioned methods are being used to further improve the efficiency and quality of patient care and to promote innovative approaches in the field of H@H. The results of the study will soon be published on this channel.

Recommendations for practice

Based on the findings of the SHIFT study to date, the following recommendations can be made for practice:

  • Integration of telehealth: Healthcare organisations should implement telehealth as an integral part of their services to improve patient care.
  • Technological infrastructure: Investing in the necessary technology and infrastructure is crucial to ensure smooth communication between patients and healthcare professionals.
  • Training for healthcare professionals: Regular training for doctors and nurses should be offered to optimise the use of telemedicine and promote confidence in using digital tools.
  • Patient education: Information campaigns should be launched to educate patients about the possibilities and limitations of telemedicine and to dispel concerns.
  • Data protection and security: Strict data protection guidelines must be established to ensure patient trust in telemedicine services.
  • Evaluation and adaptation: Regular evaluations of telemedicine services should be carried out to ensure continuous improvement and adaptation to patient needs.

These recommendations aim to sustainably utilise the benefits of telemedicine in the context of H@H and increase the quality of healthcare.

Literature and other sources

1 Denz MD (2015) Telemedicine in Switzerland. Therapeutische Umschau 72:581-585. doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930/a000722

2 Blozik E, Wildeisen IE, Fueglistaler P, Von Overbeck J (2012) Telemedicine can help to ensure that patients receive timely medical care. J Telemed Telecare 18:119-121. doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2011.110812

3 Von Gossler C, Klauser C (2017) Telemedicine in Switzerland - the example of Medgate. Dtsch med Wochenschr 142:334-339. doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-111357

4 (2018) Interview with Dr Andy Fischer, CEO of Medgate - "Telemedicine is not a competitor to GPs in Switzerland, but a useful addition." Gesundh ökon Qual manag 23:175-177. doi.org/10.1055/a-0661-6693

5. pandit JA, Pawelek JB, Leff B, Topol EJ (2024) The hospital at home in the USA: current status and future prospects. npj Digit Med 7:48. doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01040-9

6 Eron L, King P, Marineau M, Yonehara C (2004) Treating Acute Infections by Telemedicine in the Home. Clinical Infectious Diseases 39:1175-1181. doi.org/10.1086/424671

7 Zychlinski N, Fluss R, Goldberg Y, et al (2024) Tele-medicine controlled hospital at home is associated with better outcomes than hospital stay. PLoS ONE 19:e0309077. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309077

Citation of the contribution